Actions

Complex Systems Summer School 2014-Panel Questions: Difference between revisions

From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
6.What mathematical tools do we lack most?<br>
6.What mathematical tools do we lack most?<br>
7.It is clear that the way we understand Ecology and its processes is completely biased by the early notions of human Economic competition (1700-1800) - and that also applies to the principle of natural selection. In your opinion, is there an alternative way of understanding ecology under a different paradigm?<br>
7.It is clear that the way we understand Ecology and its processes is completely biased by the early notions of human Economic competition (1700-1800) - and that also applies to the principle of natural selection. In your opinion, is there an alternative way of understanding ecology under a different paradigm?<br>
8.How does people's belief about economics change the working of economics itself?

Revision as of 16:23, 24 June 2014

Complex Systems Summer School 2014

Please post questions you might have for our panel, Brian Arthur, Luis Bettencourt, Simon DeDeo, Jennifer Dunne.

1.How do we model the creation of novelty?
2.What is the origin and the importance of stochasticity in complex systems?
3.Are the characteristics of consciousness consistent with those of an emergent property?
4.What do you believe, but can not (yet) prove?
5.What role do models play in the analysis of complex systems (prediction? mechanistic insights? computer experiments?) and what does that depend on?
6.What mathematical tools do we lack most?
7.It is clear that the way we understand Ecology and its processes is completely biased by the early notions of human Economic competition (1700-1800) - and that also applies to the principle of natural selection. In your opinion, is there an alternative way of understanding ecology under a different paradigm?
8.How does people's belief about economics change the working of economics itself?