Complex Systems Summer School 2014-Project Presentations: Difference between revisions
From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki
(added group members) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Presentation Notes== | ==Presentation Notes== | ||
===Towards a Unified Theory of Biodiversity=== | ===Towards a Unified Theory of Biodiversity [[Media:Presentation_Biodiversity.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* what determines species diversity? | * what determines species diversity? | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* can get some qualitatively similar scaling to metabolic theory by limiting energy in system by preventing some births | * can get some qualitatively similar scaling to metabolic theory by limiting energy in system by preventing some births | ||
===Software and Living Systems: In Evolution a Software Engineer?=== | ===Software and Living Systems: In Evolution a Software Engineer? [[Media:Presentation_CellsAndSoftware.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
Fahad, Renske, Diana, George, Ana Maria, Stojan and Ernest | |||
* cycle: innovation <-> (constrained by) conservation <-> efficiency | * cycle: innovation <-> (constrained by) conservation <-> efficiency | ||
* Hox genes (segmentation of body parts): modular control (each piece corresponds to a different body segment), order is preserved, innovation through duplication of entire cluster | * Hox genes (segmentation of body parts): modular control (each piece corresponds to a different body segment), order is preserved, innovation through duplication of entire cluster | ||
Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
* future: how can they inform and guide us | * future: how can they inform and guide us | ||
===Information Theory of the Heart=== | ===Information Theory of the Heart [[Media:Presentation_InfoTheoryOfTheHeart.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* model electricity flow through the heart using two models (probabilistic CA and deterministic PDE) on a 128x128 grid of heart cells | * model electricity flow through the heart using two models (probabilistic CA and deterministic PDE) on a 128x128 grid of heart cells | ||
Line 32: | Line 33: | ||
* Q: comment: Granger causality is a more general version of transfer entropy and may be more effective for numerical rather than symbolic data | * Q: comment: Granger causality is a more general version of transfer entropy and may be more effective for numerical rather than symbolic data | ||
===Tradeoff between Division of Labor and Robustness to Perturbations=== | ===Tradeoff between Division of Labor and Robustness to Perturbations [[Media:Presentation_DivisionOfLabor.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* optimum depends on environment, focus on microbial ecology | * optimum depends on environment, focus on microbial ecology | ||
Line 42: | Line 43: | ||
* future: explore other systems | * future: explore other systems | ||
===The Architecture of an Empirical Genotype-Phenotype Mapping=== | ===The Architecture of an Empirical Genotype-Phenotype Mapping [[Media:Presentation_GenotypeNetwork.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* three goals: | * three goals: | ||
Line 54: | Line 55: | ||
** networks studied have nearly optimal accessibility (measures reversibility of evolution) | ** networks studied have nearly optimal accessibility (measures reversibility of evolution) | ||
===Are Ants Urban Planners?=== | ===Are Ants Urban Planners? [[Media:Presentation_AntsAndCities.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
Claire, Diana, Morgan, Bernardo, Michael, Alex, Ernest, Alberto, James and Rohan <br> | |||
* qualitative similarities between ants foraging patterns and city transportation networks | * qualitative similarities between ants foraging patterns and city transportation networks | ||
* questions | * questions | ||
Line 68: | Line 70: | ||
* Q: can this be used to suggest likely archaeological sites to explore next? | * Q: can this be used to suggest likely archaeological sites to explore next? | ||
===Structural and Functional Robustness in Networks=== | ===Structural and Functional Robustness in Networks [[Media:Presentation_RobustnessInNetworks.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* ability to retain function in the presence of variation | * ability to retain function in the presence of variation | ||
Line 77: | Line 79: | ||
* future: consider effect of relational cohesion | * future: consider effect of relational cohesion | ||
===A Complex Fishery System in Northern Cameroon=== | ===A Complex Fishery System in Northern Cameroon [[Media:Presentation_Cameroon.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* complex social-ecological system; messy, scarse, quantitative and qualitative data | * complex social-ecological system; messy, scarse, quantitative and qualitative data | ||
Line 88: | Line 90: | ||
** maximum entropy: ; limited by lack of understanding of mechanism | ** maximum entropy: ; limited by lack of understanding of mechanism | ||
===The Evolution of Inter-disciplinary Fields=== | ===The Evolution of Inter-disciplinary Fields [[Media:Presentation_InterdisciplinaryResearch.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* high risk, high reward? examples of inter-disciplinary work not doing as well or hurting careers | * high risk, high reward? examples of inter-disciplinary work not doing as well or hurting careers | ||
Line 98: | Line 100: | ||
* future: study dynamic network of author and/or field connections | * future: study dynamic network of author and/or field connections | ||
===Quarantine Strategies in Financial Networks=== | ===Quarantine Strategies in Financial Networks [[Media:Presentation_QuarantineStrategiesInFinancialNetworks.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* banks becoming more centralized, network more connected; too big to fail or too central to fail? | * banks becoming more centralized, network more connected; too big to fail or too central to fail? | ||
Line 108: | Line 110: | ||
** system not fragile to just large banks, but to magnitude of (possibly distributed) shock overall | ** system not fragile to just large banks, but to magnitude of (possibly distributed) shock overall | ||
===Topological Modeling of Power Networks=== | ===Topological Modeling of Power Networks [[Media:Presentation_TopologyOfPowerNetworks.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* questions: | * questions: | ||
Line 119: | Line 121: | ||
* existing generative models do not match properties of their dataset (Polish power grid) | * existing generative models do not match properties of their dataset (Polish power grid) | ||
===Norm Propagation and Reinforcement Learning=== | ===Norm Propagation and Reinforcement Learning [[Media:Presentation_NormPropagation.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* norms constrain behavior, decrease diversity | * norms constrain behavior, decrease diversity | ||
Line 127: | Line 129: | ||
* future: impact of external influence/information, cognitive dissonance | * future: impact of external influence/information, cognitive dissonance | ||
===A Model of Revolutions=== | ===A Model of Revolutions [[Media:Presentation_Revolutions.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* a revolution is not just a change - it's a phase transition | * a revolution is not just a change - it's a phase transition | ||
Line 145: | Line 147: | ||
* Q: feedback that chaos often shifts public opinion towards wanting a strong leader | * Q: feedback that chaos often shifts public opinion towards wanting a strong leader | ||
===Cough Analysis=== | ===Cough Analysis [[Media:Presentation_CoughAnalysis.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* pulmonary diseases/conditions categorized into chronic and acute cases | * pulmonary diseases/conditions categorized into chronic and acute cases | ||
Line 153: | Line 155: | ||
* future: develop classification tool, handle other bodily sounds | * future: develop classification tool, handle other bodily sounds | ||
===Co-evolution of Anti-vaccination Sentiment and Flu Infections=== | ===Co-evolution of Anti-vaccination Sentiment and Flu Infections [[Media:Presentation_AntivaccinationSentiment.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* how to measure efficacy; can only measure if person went to the doctor | * how to measure efficacy; can only measure if person went to the doctor | ||
Line 165: | Line 167: | ||
* behavioral transitions: "never getting shot again" | * behavioral transitions: "never getting shot again" | ||
===Disease Spread in Multiplex Networks=== | ===Disease Spread in Multiplex Networks [[Media:Presentation_MultiplexNetworks.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* food webs with parasites, really changes food web structure and dynamics | * food webs with parasites, really changes food web structure and dynamics | ||
Line 176: | Line 178: | ||
** effect of distance and spatial structure | ** effect of distance and spatial structure | ||
===Fractals and Scaling in Finance: A Comparison of Two Models=== | ===Fractals and Scaling in Finance: A Comparison of Two Models [[Media:Presentation_FractalsAndScalingInFinance.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* extreme events (fat tails): common modeling assumptions do not match real data | * extreme events (fat tails): common modeling assumptions do not match real data | ||
Line 191: | Line 193: | ||
** what are the economic mechanisms behind fat tails and long-dependence? | ** what are the economic mechanisms behind fat tails and long-dependence? | ||
===Coupling of Networks: Non-linear Effects of Pesticides on Food Web Dynamics=== | ===Coupling of Networks: Non-linear Effects of Pesticides on Food Web Dynamics [[Media:Presentation_CouplingOfNetworks.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: Hiroshi Ashikaga, Beth Lusczek, Nhat Nguyen, Sanja Selakovic, Brian Thompson<br> | Group members: Hiroshi Ashikaga, Beth Lusczek, Nhat Nguyen, Sanja Selakovic, Brian Thompson<br> | ||
* model two interacting networks; each has different nodes, different edges, different dynamics which can affect one another | * model two interacting networks; each has different nodes, different edges, different dynamics which can affect one another | ||
Line 205: | Line 207: | ||
* take-away message: simulations and mathematical analysis can help us understand and anticipate the consequences of pesticide use on an ecosystem | * take-away message: simulations and mathematical analysis can help us understand and anticipate the consequences of pesticide use on an ecosystem | ||
===Consciousness: An Emergent Phenomenon?=== | ===Consciousness: An Emergent Phenomenon? [[Media:Presentation_Consciousness.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* agreed on: | * agreed on: | ||
Line 222: | Line 224: | ||
* future: AI experiments can allow us to simulate these functions, which the integrated info theory approach can't do | * future: AI experiments can allow us to simulate these functions, which the integrated info theory approach can't do | ||
===Persistence of Pollination Systems=== | ===Persistence of Pollination Systems [[Media:Presentation_Pollination.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* many pollination systems rely heavily on synergistic relationship | * many pollination systems rely heavily on synergistic relationship | ||
Line 245: | Line 247: | ||
** out-crossing | ** out-crossing | ||
===Bitcoin=== | ===Bitcoin [[Media:Presentation_Bitcoin.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* focused on three major events (volatility is interesting) | * focused on three major events (volatility is interesting) | ||
Line 255: | Line 257: | ||
** observed differences in sentiment around key dates | ** observed differences in sentiment around key dates | ||
===Social Institutions and Economic Inequality=== | ===Social Institutions and Economic Inequality [[Media:Presentation_EconomicInequality.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* model relationship between economic inequality and economic growth | * model relationship between economic inequality and economic growth | ||
Line 271: | Line 273: | ||
** how can we inform policy with this kind of model? | ** how can we inform policy with this kind of model? | ||
===Drunk Game Theory=== | ===Drunk Game Theory [[Media:Presentation_DGT.pdf|[slides]]]=== | ||
Group members: <br> | Group members: <br> | ||
* perceived payoff changes as function of individual state | * perceived payoff changes as function of individual state |
Latest revision as of 01:08, 4 August 2014
Complex Systems Summer School 2014 |
Use this space to post project presentations and outlines. Include group members, a brief outline, and your slides.
Presentation Notes
Towards a Unified Theory of Biodiversity [slides]
Group members:
- what determines species diversity?
- neutral theory (death rate, birth rate, speciation rate same across all species)
- metabolic theory (all three assumptions are wrong, scaling laws)
- their model: define rates using only one free variable
- can get some qualitatively similar scaling to metabolic theory by limiting energy in system by preventing some births
Software and Living Systems: In Evolution a Software Engineer? [slides]
Group members:
Fahad, Renske, Diana, George, Ana Maria, Stojan and Ernest
- cycle: innovation <-> (constrained by) conservation <-> efficiency
- Hox genes (segmentation of body parts): modular control (each piece corresponds to a different body segment), order is preserved, innovation through duplication of entire cluster
- telecom system: modular, core features are conserved, duplication used for testing etc. which can lead to innovation
- future: how can they inform and guide us
Information Theory of the Heart [slides]
Group members:
- model electricity flow through the heart using two models (probabilistic CA and deterministic PDE) on a 128x128 grid of heart cells
- four wave patterns: point stimulation, spiral, anatomical re-entry, multiple wavelets
- entropy of single cells can't differentiate
- mutual information can identify sets of cells whose excitation times overlap
- future work: transfer entropy
- Q: comment: Granger causality is a more general version of transfer entropy and may be more effective for numerical rather than symbolic data
Tradeoff between Division of Labor and Robustness to Perturbations [slides]
Group members:
- optimum depends on environment, focus on microbial ecology
- assumptions: leaky functions, adaptive gene loss
- "black queen": for each essential task, somebody's got to do it
- threshold phenomenon: when disconnected, more robust; when giant connected component, could make system very vulnerable to environmental changes
- real-world data, then agent-based simulations
- shocking system removes high-degree nodes
- future: explore other systems
The Architecture of an Empirical Genotype-Phenotype Mapping [slides]
Group members:
- three goals:
- explore internal structure of genotype network
- explore similarities between genotype networks for different species
- understand biologically-inspired context
- link between two binding sites if they differ by a point or shift mutation
- findings
- short geodesics but large diameter
- positive assortativity of node degree and level of mutation
- networks studied have nearly optimal accessibility (measures reversibility of evolution)
Are Ants Urban Planners? [slides]
Group members:
Claire, Diana, Morgan, Bernardo, Michael, Alex, Ernest, Alberto, James and Rohan
- qualitative similarities between ants foraging patterns and city transportation networks
- questions
- underlying mechanisms
- different kinds of networks (ant foraging vs ant travel network between nests)
- hypotheses:
- simple foraging model can produce properties common to both city and ant networks
- balance energy use with benefits from exploited resources (cost-benefit)
- a few basic model parameters can describe some of the major qualitative differences (e.g. bottom-up vs top-down)
- simple foraging model can produce properties common to both city and ant networks
- simulations using two models (agent-based and global) on multiple scenarios (e.g. lake, river)
- future: explore impact of varied terrain, what is the role of central planning
- Q: can this be used to suggest likely archaeological sites to explore next?
Structural and Functional Robustness in Networks [slides]
Group members:
- ability to retain function in the presence of variation
- three models: sandpile, road network, social organization
- sandpile: probability of cascade failure
- road model: two road types, extra cost to switch; effect of removal on simplest path or shortest path
- social org: "failure" is reduction of performance rather than node removal
- future: consider effect of relational cohesion
A Complex Fishery System in Northern Cameroon [slides]
Group members:
- complex social-ecological system; messy, scarse, quantitative and qualitative data
- focal points:
- understand dynamics of canal proliferation
- understand decision-making process
- approaches:
- game theory: multiple models and perspectives; limited by Folk Theorem, abstraction of mechanisms
- agent-based: look at wealth vs number of canals; limited by ad-hoc assumptions and params
- maximum entropy: ; limited by lack of understanding of mechanism
The Evolution of Inter-disciplinary Fields [slides]
Group members:
- high risk, high reward? examples of inter-disciplinary work not doing as well or hurting careers
- instead of looking at success of i-d vs non papers, look at i-d vs non researchers
- by combining APS with arXiv data, can analyze whether prob of or time to publication is different between i-d and non work
- are more authors engaging in i-d work? which fields are more or less i-d over time?
- entropy of subject areas of work as measure of inter-disciplinarity
- lower entropy is correlated with higher eigenvector centrality
- future: study dynamic network of author and/or field connections
Quarantine Strategies in Financial Networks [slides]
Group members:
- banks becoming more centralized, network more connected; too big to fail or too central to fail?
- traditional lit: risk-sharing, robust-yet-fragile, resilience as function of topology
- their approach: containment strategies for shocks (minimize post-shock loss to system), inspired by epidemiology
- simulations: system regulator (recapitalize), self-quarantine (cut edges), and both
- results:
- given self-quarantine, additional benefit of regulation is small
- system not fragile to just large banks, but to magnitude of (possibly distributed) shock overall
Topological Modeling of Power Networks [slides]
Group members:
- questions:
- what are reasonable generative models?
- can these be generalized to other infrastructure networks?
- can we infer robustness from structure alone?
- spatial networks, cost of creating new links
- challenge: geo-coordinates of nodes are not typically available (for security reasons), want to infer using weights and distances of links
- use network layout algorithm, multi-dimensional scaling
- existing generative models do not match properties of their dataset (Polish power grid)
Norm Propagation and Reinforcement Learning [slides]
Group members:
- norms constrain behavior, decrease diversity
- people have social identity, formed both by genetics and choice
- change identity based on disposition, which is affected by observing others
- two belief propagation models: ? and Bayesian
- future: impact of external influence/information, cognitive dissonance
A Model of Revolutions [slides]
Group members:
- a revolution is not just a change - it's a phase transition
- model:
- agents (like or dislike dictator) are the nodes in two networks: government and society
- choose random node, affects opinion of underlings in gov network
- interaction society: change opinion based on what your neighbors think
- in each "round," do gov op, then society op
- studied two parameters
- proportion of agents activated in society each round (curfew, internet, etc)
- alpha (material gains, loyalty, religious or ideological identity)
- time until phase shift very sensitive to initial conditions
- questions
- are revolutions less likely if those higher up in gov are central nodes in society?
- study dynamics
- Q: what defines a revolution?
- Q: feedback that chaos often shifts public opinion towards wanting a strong leader
Cough Analysis [slides]
Group members:
- pulmonary diseases/conditions categorized into chronic and acute cases
- cystic fibrosis: thick sticky mucus, not like "Triscuits in your nose"
- should be able to detect differences in wave form using ML or other techniques
- online database already running (but has many undesired "features")
- future: develop classification tool, handle other bodily sounds
Co-evolution of Anti-vaccination Sentiment and Flu Infections [slides]
Group members:
- how to measure efficacy; can only measure if person went to the doctor
- risk perception differs by geographical region, shaped by news
- positive correlation between sentiment and vaccination rates
- homophily and contagion favor negative sentiment
- questions:
- is sentiment correlated with current flu incidence? past?
- can incidence and sentiment collectively predict coverage?
- from Twitter data: pos/neg sentiment, coverage; lots of technical challenges
- behavioral transitions: "never getting shot again"
Disease Spread in Multiplex Networks [slides]
Group members:
- food webs with parasites, really changes food web structure and dynamics
- multiplex network (spatial multiplex model):
- trophic transmission layer (food web: eating infected prey/vector)
- vectorial transmission layer (vectors sucking blood of infected hosts)
- disease spreading dynamics: can spread in either layer or both
- future:
- investigate role of each species in each environment
- effect of distance and spatial structure
Fractals and Scaling in Finance: A Comparison of Two Models [slides]
Group members:
- extreme events (fat tails): common modeling assumptions do not match real data
- Levy process
- self-similarity across scales, memory of past, long-term behavior
- "volatility clustering" = burstiness
- fractal Brownian motion allows dependence of processes, but does not have fat tails
- idea: fractal Levy process, composite of two functions
- subordination
- generalized Hurst exponent
- questions:
- how do fractal Levy process and Subordination compare when it comes to prediction?
- are there other processes that are good models?
- what are the economic mechanisms behind fat tails and long-dependence?
Coupling of Networks: Non-linear Effects of Pesticides on Food Web Dynamics [slides]
Group members: Hiroshi Ashikaga, Beth Lusczek, Nhat Nguyen, Sanja Selakovic, Brian Thompson
- model two interacting networks; each has different nodes, different edges, different dynamics which can affect one another
- focus in particular on pesticides and a bio-energetic food web
- 8 pesticides, 17 species in soil food web
- model:
- bio-energetic food web: birth rate, death rate, predator-prey, intra-species competition
- cross-network: effect of pesticide on death rate of each species, non-linear effects of multiple pesticides on each species (can be additive, synergistic, or antagonistic)
- master equations relating populations of species and concentrations of pesticides
- future work:
- model consumption, decay, and inflow of pesticides in the system (e.g. degradation of pesticides through consumption by species, bioaccumulation)
- analyze sensitivity of the food web to changes in pesticide concentrations
- take-away message: simulations and mathematical analysis can help us understand and anticipate the consequences of pesticide use on an ecosystem
Consciousness: An Emergent Phenomenon? [slides]
Group members:
- agreed on:
- consciousness is a unified subjective experience
- project should be limited to human consciousness
- question: can we perceive the emergence of consciousness in an artificial agent?
- integrated information theory: anything that can perceive, process/integrate, and emit information is conscious
- their model
- hierarchy: neurons, nervous system, brain structures, brain, organism, environment
- integration of info, but also hierarchical anatomical level, emergence from interactions
- can we apply AI to simulate conscious agent?
- Minsky: don't try to capture everything in one word, break down into multiple parts (suggests 20)
- focus on: self-reflection, decision, reaction (fits model of AI brain)
- consciousness and HCI: they believe that all 20 functions can be simulated, interaction is essential
- can humans recognize X in the computer? maybe not, so instead suppose we have an oracle that can
- future: AI experiments can allow us to simulate these functions, which the integrated info theory approach can't do
Persistence of Pollination Systems [slides]
Group members:
- many pollination systems rely heavily on synergistic relationship
- nenctar robbers eat pollen but don't help fertilize
- but could have indirect positive effects
- model 4 species: open flower, tubular flower, pollinator, robber
- ODE model
- coexistence when pollinator does better than robber on open flowers but less on tubular, and ? > 1
- abundance over time is chaotic? with linear center
- agent-based model
- analytical model must assume good spatial mixing, but spatial dynamics are essential for pollination analysis
- model movement of bees, energy intake and consumption, reproduction
- flowers reproduce only if pollinated by same species (open/tubular)
- results:
- if more pollinators than robbers, then pollinators and open flowers survive
- if more robbers than pollinators, then everybody dies
- space and stochasticity can have an effect
- future:
- sensitivity analysis
- find parameters to make ABM match analytical model
- allow for mixed or dynamic strategies of bees
- out-crossing
Bitcoin [slides]
Group members:
- focused on three major events (volatility is interesting)
- look at network, highly connected core, long chains thought to be money launderers trying to mask trail
- measures of complexity, order, and freedom (MacArthur and U...?)
- real systematic change in structure of network during different periods captured by various measures
- network properties -> ? -> bitcoin dynamics; what is the "?"
- sentiment analysis of newspaper articles, blogs, etc.
- observed differences in sentiment around key dates
Social Institutions and Economic Inequality [slides]
Group members:
- model relationship between economic inequality and economic growth
- Kuznets curve (wealth balanced, then inequality increases, then stabilizes back to equality)
- ?: inequality induces democracy
- existing analytical model is flawed for several reasons
- their (agent-based) model
- question: how does inter-class marriage affect timing or shape of Kuznets curve
- model via assortativity coefficient
- results: lower assortativity yields a Kuznets curve that is shorter and earlier
- future:
- sensitivity analysis
- model collective action
- look at empirical data
- how can we inform policy with this kind of model?
Drunk Game Theory [slides]
Group members:
- perceived payoff changes as function of individual state
- model
- cooperate = buy beer for oneself and partner
- defect wait for other
- payoff = when sober, net gain of beers (free - paid-for); when drunk, net intake
- parameters: coefficient of intoxication, sobriety constant (per person)
- assumptions: uniform distribution in bar; ?
- analytical study: vector fields, fixed points:
- simulations: fixed point reached depends on initial conditions and parameter values; matches analytical predictions
- summary
- new branch of game theory and mathematics!
- in evolutionary game theory (EGT), players change; in drunk game theory (DGT), the game changes
- future: genetic predisposition, pre-drinking behaviors, segregation vs socialization