Actions

Structure-dynamics interplay in complex networks: Difference between revisions

From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Lucas Antiqueira]], [[Bruno Abrahao]], [[Jonathan Cannon]], [[Damian Blasi]], [[Gavin Fay]], [[Joseph Gran]], [[Chaitanya Gokhale]], [[Vanessa Weinberger]], [[Borys Wrobel]]
[[Lucas Antiqueira]], [[Bruno Abrahao]], [[Jonathan Cannon]], [[Damian Blasi]], [[Gavin Fay]], [[Joseph Gran]], [[Chaitanya Gokhale]], [[Vanessa Weinberger]], [[Borys Wrobel]]


Goal: Analyze and explain relationships between network structure (degree, centrality, motifs, etc) and network dynamics.
Goal: Analyze and explain relationships between network structure and network dynamics.


We have two different trends. The first one has the following features:
We have two different trends. The first one has the following features:

Revision as of 04:44, 10 June 2010

Lucas Antiqueira, Bruno Abrahao, Jonathan Cannon, Damian Blasi, Gavin Fay, Joseph Gran, Chaitanya Gokhale, Vanessa Weinberger, Borys Wrobel

Goal: Analyze and explain relationships between network structure and network dynamics.

We have two different trends. The first one has the following features:

  • The dynamics is a diffusion process (random walk) occurring on the network.
  • The structure is represented by different network models (random, small-world, scale-free).
  • Applications? Any network whose dynamical properties are reasonably represented by random walks.
  • People interested: Lucas Antiqueira, Damian Blasi

Second trend:

  • The dynamics is related to the network evolution in terms of inclusion of nodes, rewiring of edges, change of nodes/edges properties, etc, etc.
  • Motifs play a special role in structural analysis.
  • Special attention to food-webs.
  • People interested: Jonathan Cannon