Sustainable Development and Green National Accounts: Difference between revisions
From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
usable as a criterion for policy evaluation as well as for determining sustainable economic | usable as a criterion for policy evaluation as well as for determining sustainable economic | ||
development. | development. | ||
Please review the following paper before the lecture: | |||
* [[Media: Green_National_Accounts.pdf | The Welfare Economic Theory of Green National Accounts]] |
Latest revision as of 00:57, 14 July 2009
Summer School on Global Sustainability |
Abstract:
This paper takes a critical look at the literature on green national accounts. The problem studied is to find a linear index of economic variables that responds to perturbations in the same direction as social well-being. The thesis of a large literature, that net national product (which is a flow) is that index in closed economies, is shown in some interpretations to be simply false and in others to suffer from deep estimation problems. It is argued that capital depreciation using shadow prices should certainly be included in national accounts, but that the right welfare index is a comprehensive measure of wealth, defined as the shadow value of an economy’s stock of all capital assets. It is shown that comprehensive wealth is usable as a criterion for policy evaluation as well as for determining sustainable economic development.
Please review the following paper before the lecture: