Actions

Anomalous diffusion on complex networks: Difference between revisions

From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{CSSS 2010 Santa Fe}}
Members:
 
Next meeting '''Friday''' (when?)
 
Members/interested:
* [[Lucas Antiqueira]]
* [[Lucas Antiqueira]]
* [[Damian Blasi]]
* [[Damian Blasi]]
* [[Borys Wrobel]]
* [[Borys Wrobel]]


A standard random walk over a n-dimensional lattice is a stochastic process where the average square of the distance from the origin is proportional to the number of steps of the process -namely  <r^2>=c<t> where c is a constant. Among other names of this process in different contexts -brownian motion, Wiener process-  is mostly know as diffusion. A possible generalization of this process is to define an anomalous case as <r^2>=c(<t>^h). The exponent h fixes the behavior of the walker. If 0<h<1 we have an antipersistent behavior: the walker prefers to return to its original location; by the other hand, if we choose 1<h<2 we will have a persistent behavior: the walker tends to apart from its origin.
A standard random walk over a n-dimensional lattice is a stochastic process where the average square of the distance from the origin <r^2> is proportional to the number of steps of the process <t> - namely  <r^2>=c<t>, where c is a constant. Among other names of this process in different contexts -Brownian motion, Wiener process-  it is mostly known as diffusion. A possible generalization of this process is to define an anomalous case as <r^2>=c(<t>^h). The exponent h fixes the behavior of the walker. If 0<h<1 we have an antipersistent behavior: the walker prefers to return to its original location; on the other hand, if we choose 1<h<2 we will have a persistent behavior: the walker tends to apart from its origin.
This kind of processes are easily mapped to complex networks. Now the distance is the chemical distance between the original birth node and the node reached at time t. The interesting fact is that even if  the exponent of the walker is 1 (this is a random walker) if we put it over a complex network the resulting average behavior will not be necessary that of a diffusive process. So, there is a topology-induced anomalous diffusion.
 
This kind of processes are easily mapped to complex networks. The distance is the shortest path length between the original birth node and the node reached at time t. The interesting fact is that even if  the exponent of the walker is 1 (this is a random walker), if we put it over a complex network the resulting average behavior will not necessarily be that of a diffusive process. So, there is a topology-induced anomalous diffusion.


Why this matters? Well, many communication processes in networks are well described as local random walks in the sense that the transmission its realized from one node to another chosen randomly between its neighbors. The idea is to run this walkers over different interesting networks -random, Small World, preferential attachment and real ones- to see  wha
Why this matters? Well, many communication processes in networks are well described as local random walks in the sense that the transmission its realized from one node to another randomly choosing between its neighbors. The idea is to run this walkers over different interesting networks - random, small-world, scale-free and real-world ones - to check the differences in the exponent h and also try to explain those differences. In other words, we want to evaluate what effect network structure has on diffusion processes.

Latest revision as of 18:08, 20 June 2010

Members:

A standard random walk over a n-dimensional lattice is a stochastic process where the average square of the distance from the origin <r^2> is proportional to the number of steps of the process <t> - namely <r^2>=c<t>, where c is a constant. Among other names of this process in different contexts -Brownian motion, Wiener process- it is mostly known as diffusion. A possible generalization of this process is to define an anomalous case as <r^2>=c(<t>^h). The exponent h fixes the behavior of the walker. If 0<h<1 we have an antipersistent behavior: the walker prefers to return to its original location; on the other hand, if we choose 1<h<2 we will have a persistent behavior: the walker tends to apart from its origin.

This kind of processes are easily mapped to complex networks. The distance is the shortest path length between the original birth node and the node reached at time t. The interesting fact is that even if the exponent of the walker is 1 (this is a random walker), if we put it over a complex network the resulting average behavior will not necessarily be that of a diffusive process. So, there is a topology-induced anomalous diffusion.

Why this matters? Well, many communication processes in networks are well described as local random walks in the sense that the transmission its realized from one node to another randomly choosing between its neighbors. The idea is to run this walkers over different interesting networks - random, small-world, scale-free and real-world ones - to check the differences in the exponent h and also try to explain those differences. In other words, we want to evaluate what effect network structure has on diffusion processes.