Program: Difference between revisions
From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki
Stacey Lydon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
• Share different results approaches and methods for studying cooperation, collective action and the problem of the commons. | • Share different results approaches and methods for studying cooperation, collective action and the problem of the commons. | ||
• Discuss synergies and limitations of combining different methods to understand these questions. | • Discuss synergies and limitations of combining different methods (e.g. experiments, theoretical, computational models, surveys) to understand these questions. | ||
• Evaluate the state of the art of the literature and identify the new relevant questions and approaches to the problem. | • Evaluate the state of the art of the literature and identify the new relevant questions and approaches to the problem for the near future. | ||
| Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
! 11am – 12:30pm | ! 11am – 12:30pm | ||
| Round Table: “Models of cooperation and the commons - I” | | Round Table: “Models of cooperation and the commons - I” | ||
-R. Sethi: (A | -R. Sethi: (A simple model of collective action) | ||
-Ch. Jaramillo (Networks In Collective Action) | -Ch. Jaramillo (Networks In Collective Action) | ||
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
| Round Table: “Models of cooperation and the commons - II” | | Round Table: “Models of cooperation and the commons - II” | ||
-A. de Froment ( | -A. de Froment (Personality Correlates of Third Party Punishment) | ||
-J. | -J. Ladau (Robust Statistical Tests for Detecting the Effects of Interspecific Competition on Ecological Communities) | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 21:08, 7 February 2006
| Cooperation in the Commons |
Bogotá Working Group “Foundations of Cooperation in the Commons”
February 9-11, 2006, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá
1. Objectives for the working group:
• Share different results approaches and methods for studying cooperation, collective action and the problem of the commons.
• Discuss synergies and limitations of combining different methods (e.g. experiments, theoretical, computational models, surveys) to understand these questions.
• Evaluate the state of the art of the literature and identify the new relevant questions and approaches to the problem for the near future.
2. Format:
• As a working group meeting, the sessions are designed to allow for enough discussion among the group participants, based on short presentations by some of the participants.
• In each of the round table sessions there will be presenters who will share their work in about 20-30 minutes and invite for discussion with some questions.
• There will be two presentations by Bowles (Thursday) and Eckel (Friday) aimed at provoking wider questions for the group.
3. The group:
Baland, Jean-Marie CREED, Belgium http://www.fundp.ac.be/~jmbaland
Bowles, Samuel SFI http://www.santafe.edu/~bowles/
Carpenter, Jeffrey Middlebury College http://community.middlebury.edu/~jcarpent/
DeFroment, Adrian Princeton University http://www.eeb.princeton.edu/~slevin/LevPacLab.html
Eckel, Catherine University of Texas http://www.utdallas.edu/dept/socsci/faculty/ceckel.html
Ladau, Josh Santa Fe Institute http://www.santafe.edu/research/postdocs.php
Somanathan, Eswaran Indian Statistical Institute http://www.isid.ac.in/%7Esom/
Sethi, Rajiv Barnard, Columbia U. http://www.columbia.edu/~rs328/rajivsethi.htm
Johnson, Cathleen CIRANO Canada http://www.cirano.qc.ca/en/bottin/cv.php?coderelation=1649
Jaramillo, Christian U. de Los Andes http://economia.uniandes.edu.co/cjaramillo.htm
Cardenas, Juan Camilo U. de Los Andes http://economia.uniandes.edu.co/cardenas.htm
4. Program
| THURSDAY February 9 | |
|---|---|
| 8:30am - 9:30am | -Welcome remarks and introductions of participants in the working group
-Logistics and overview of the program -Goals and expected outcomes |
| 9:30am – 10:00am | BREAK |
| 10:30am - 12:30pm | S. Bowles: “Social Preferences and Public Policy: Are good laws a substitute for good citizens?” |
| 12:30pm – 2pm | LUNCH (Villa Paulina) |
| 2:00pm - 4:30pm | Round Table: “Lessons from the field”
-J.Carpenter (Field Experiments: social preferences and productivity among fishermen in Japan) -J.M.Baland (Field Survey: Firewood collection in Nepal) -E.Somanathan (Satellite images and field survey: Decentralization in forest conservation, Himalayas) |
| 8pm | Dinner at Monserrate (“Casa de San Isidro”) |
| FRIDAY February 10 | |
|---|---|
| 8:30am – 10:30am | C. Eckel: “Measurement of Preferences in Socio-Economic Surveys: Early Results from the Mexican Family Life Survey”
C. Johnson: “Measuring risk and time preference (in general and in the field)” |
| 10:30am – 11:00am | BREAK |
| 11am – 12:30pm | Round Table: “Models of cooperation and the commons - I”
-R. Sethi: (A simple model of collective action) -Ch. Jaramillo (Networks In Collective Action) |
| 12:30pm – 2pm | LUNCH (Villa Paulina) |
| 2:00pm - 4:30pm | Round Table: “Models of cooperation and the commons - II”
-A. de Froment (Personality Correlates of Third Party Punishment) -J. Ladau (Robust Statistical Tests for Detecting the Effects of Interspecific Competition on Ecological Communities) |
| SATURDAY February 11 | |
|---|---|
| 8:30am – 10:30am | Round table: “New designs of experiments”
-E. Somanathan (a new field experiment on the commons) -J.C. Cardenas (3 field experiments for fisheries, forests and irrigation) -and anyone else wants to share ongoing or new designs |
| 10:30am – 11:00am | BREAK |
| 11am - 1pm | Round table “Lessons and limitations from combining methods”
ALL, someone should provoke the questions |
| 1pm – 2pm | LUNCH (“Uroti Galeria”) |
| 2:00pm - 4:30pm | Working group conclusions and road ahead in the study and understanding of the commons. What are the promising questions and methods in the study of the commons? |