Communicating complexity: Difference between revisions
From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki
No edit summary |
Brianlawler (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I am always up for discussions of how to communicate scientific ideas effectively to non-scientists. Not sure I understand exactly what you're talking about though. Do you mean using complexity to communicate complexity? Ryan. | I am always up for discussions of how to communicate scientific ideas effectively to non-scientists. Not sure I understand exactly what you're talking about though. Do you mean using complexity to communicate complexity? Ryan. | ||
I would be up to a discussion concerning the communication of scientific ideas to non-scientists too (complexity just as much as any other scientific issue for that matter). [[ | I would be up to a discussion concerning the communication of scientific ideas to non-scientists too (complexity just as much as any other scientific issue for that matter). [[Amelie Veron]] | ||
Very interested in this. I'd opened a [[Complexity for the General Public]] topic but [[Amelie Veron]] noticed an overlap with what you have proposed here. Can we combine agenda here? [[Brian Lawler]] | |||
Revision as of 04:35, 7 June 2007
Contact: Andrew Bell (andybell@umich.edu)
Wondering if anyone else is interested in the role the tools of complexity might/should play in communicating nonlinearity, etc., to non-specialists (policy makers, local stakeholders).
I am always up for discussions of how to communicate scientific ideas effectively to non-scientists. Not sure I understand exactly what you're talking about though. Do you mean using complexity to communicate complexity? Ryan.
I would be up to a discussion concerning the communication of scientific ideas to non-scientists too (complexity just as much as any other scientific issue for that matter). Amelie Veron
Very interested in this. I'd opened a Complexity for the General Public topic but Amelie Veron noticed an overlap with what you have proposed here. Can we combine agenda here? Brian Lawler