Interdisciplinary research networks: Difference between revisions
From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Q1. How can interdisciplinary work be supported? | Q1. How can interdisciplinary work be supported? | ||
Q2. Do interdisciplinary paper take longer to review? | |||
== Analysis == | == Analysis == |
Revision as of 16:05, 18 June 2014
Summary
Fields of Research are more often than not isolated from one another in terms of their community, jargon, perspective, research programme (in the sense of Lakatos) and their journals and lots more. This isolation stands in the way of a fruitful merging and interaction of fields. One needs to understand the obstructions.
Objectives
• To understand the factors that lead to interdisciplinary work
• To compare the success of interdisciplinary papers with single discipline papers
• To apply network methods to citation datasets
• To gain insight into how interdisciplinary research might be better supported
Members
Leo Horstmeyer (horstmey@mis.mpg.de )
Jennifer Hellmann
Anna Olson
Lin Li (linnlii2495 at gmail dot com)
Stefan Pfenninger
Catherine Bale
Methods
Datasets
Data from 1991-2007
Includes: doi, journal_ref, primary_category, category, id, link, published, summary title, updated names
Info on metadata
Data from 1893-2010
Includes: Authors, Affiliation, DOI, title,
Specific research questions
Static network:
Dynamical network:
General:
Q1. How can interdisciplinary work be supported? Q2. Do interdisciplinary paper take longer to review?
Analysis
- Someone of the other groups posted this python-based dynamic systems simulator : http://pycx.sourceforge.net/