Nuclear Energy GSSS 2010 Debate: Difference between revisions
From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[http://www.abc.net.au/environment/articles/2010/03/03/2835725.htm Nuclear energy: money can't buy love] by David Noonan, ABC (Aus), 3 March 2010] | [http://www.abc.net.au/environment/articles/2010/03/03/2835725.htm Nuclear energy: money can't buy love] by David Noonan, ABC (Aus), 3 March 2010] | ||
--From Union of Concerned Scientists: A Resurgence of Nuclear Power Poses Significant Challenges | |||
[http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/nuclear_power_and_global_warming/nuclear-resurgence.html] | |||
--Natural Resources Defense Council: New Nuclear Power Plants Are Not a Solution for America's Energy Needs | |||
[http://www.nrdc.org/nuclear/plants/contents.asp] | |||
*Negative: | *Negative: | ||
Revision as of 03:32, 15 July 2010
| 2010 Global Sustainability Summer School |
Topic Brainstorm
Resolved: Nuclear energy production should not be a part of the US energy supply.
- Affirmative:
Critical readings & resources
--From The Institute for Energy and Environmental Research • IEER
Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free: A Roadmap for U.S. Energy Policy [WARNING: link is to full text, 257 pgs.]
Nuclear isn't necessary, from Nature Reports Climate Change
--From Caldicott, H.
Nuclear energy: money can't buy love by David Noonan, ABC (Aus), 3 March 2010]
--From Union of Concerned Scientists: A Resurgence of Nuclear Power Poses Significant Challenges [1]
--Natural Resources Defense Council: New Nuclear Power Plants Are Not a Solution for America's Energy Needs [2]
- Negative: