Nuclear Energy GSSS 2010 Debate: Difference between revisions
From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Topic Brainstorm== | ==Topic Brainstorm== | ||
Resolved: Nuclear energy should not be a part of the US energy supply. | |||
*Affirmative: | |||
Critical readings & resources | |||
[http://www.ieer.org/carbonfree/CarbonFreeNuclearFree.pdf Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free: A Roadmap for U.S. Energy Policy] | |||
[http://www.ieer.org/reports/Renewable_electric_system-Makhijani2009.pdf The Technical and Economic Feasibility of a Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free Energy System in the United States, Arjun Makhijani. March 4, 2009] | |||
[http://www.nature.com/climate/2008/0810/pdf/climate.2008.103.pdf Nuclear isn't necessary, from Nature Reports Climate Change] | |||
*Negative: | |||
Revision as of 21:39, 14 July 2010
| 2010 Global Sustainability Summer School |
Topic Brainstorm
Resolved: Nuclear energy should not be a part of the US energy supply.
- Affirmative:
Critical readings & resources
Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free: A Roadmap for U.S. Energy Policy
Nuclear isn't necessary, from Nature Reports Climate Change
- Negative: