The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Open Source Contribution Under Different Source Control Management Models: Difference between revisions
From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki
(Initial explanation. Need citations and images!) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We plan to analyse the differences between projects managed with monolithic ( | We plan to analyse the differences between projects managed with monolithic ([http://subversion.tigris.org subversion]) versus distributed ([http://git-scm.com git] and [http://mercurial.selenic.com mercurial] source control management. | ||
Research Question: | Research Question: | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* Growth of contribution community | * Growth of contribution community | ||
* Code volatility | * Code volatility | ||
Group Members: | |||
* [[Daniel Jones]] | |||
* [[Griffith Rees]] | |||
* [[Bogdan State]] | |||
Interested: | |||
* [[Oana Carja]] | |||
Revision as of 15:25, 11 June 2010
We plan to analyse the differences between projects managed with monolithic (subversion) versus distributed (git and mercurial source control management.
Research Question:
Do different source control management models have implications for:
- Structure of contribution community
- Size of contribution community
- Growth of contribution community
- Code volatility
Group Members:
Interested: