Actions

Complexity for the General Public: Difference between revisions

From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki

mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
'''Interested Participants'''
'''Interested Participants'''
* [[Brian Lawler]] - Proposed this topic. Lots of experience engaging multi-disciplinary (tech and non-tech) stakeholders, adept at UML/DFDs/etc.
* [[Brian Lawler]] - Proposed this topic. Lots of experience engaging multi-disciplinary (tech and non-tech) stakeholders, adept at UML/DFDs/etc.
* I would like to learn AS MUCH about it as possible ! Saleha Habibullah

Revision as of 02:44, 7 June 2007

Proposed Format

  • This is proposed as a mix of discussion, tutorials and demonstrations.
  • Maybe this will grow into a project.


Candiate Topics for Discusion

  • How to express complexity to people who are not adept at some of the tools we are using in the CSSS program - differential equations, MatLab, the vocabulary of complexity and chaos, etc.
  • How to express complexity in the tools of everyday business and government workers - PowerPoint, Excel, etc.
  • How to engage effectively with skilled professionals (engineers, economists, accounting/finance, ...) in their vocabulary
  • Are there extensions to existing, relatively widely used, modeling tools such as flow charts, data flow diagrams, UML models, etc. that can properly express complex systems?
  • How do we convey the key research topics worthy of pursuit to the research sponsors and similar stakeholders?


Interested Participants

  • Brian Lawler - Proposed this topic. Lots of experience engaging multi-disciplinary (tech and non-tech) stakeholders, adept at UML/DFDs/etc.
  • I would like to learn AS MUCH about it as possible ! Saleha Habibullah