Nuclear Energy GSSS 2010 Debate: Difference between revisions
From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
[http://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Reprint_10-3.pdf Potential climatic impacts and reliability of very large-scale wind farms] | [http://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Reprint_10-3.pdf Potential climatic impacts and reliability of very large-scale wind farms] | ||
--From [http://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Reprint_10-3.pdf] | --From [http://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Reprint_10-3.pdf] | ||
[http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/feature/liquid-fluoride-thorium-reactors Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors: An old idea in nuclear power gets reexamined] | |||
--From [http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/feature/liquid-fluoride-thorium-reactors] | |||
Revision as of 05:17, 17 July 2010
| 2010 Global Sustainability Summer School |
Topic Brainstorm
Resolved: Nuclear energy production should not be a part of the US energy supply.
- Affirmative:
Critical readings & resources
--From The Institute for Energy and Environmental Research • IEER
Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free: A Roadmap for U.S. Energy Policy [WARNING: link is to full text, 257 pgs.]
Nuclear isn't necessary, from Nature Reports Climate Change
--From Caldicott, H.
Nuclear energy: money can't buy love by David Noonan, ABC (Aus), 3 March 2010]
--From Union of Concerned Scientists: A Resurgence of Nuclear Power Poses Significant Challenges [1]
--Natural Resources Defense Council: New Nuclear Power Plants Are Not a Solution for America's Energy Needs [2]
- Negative:
Critical Readings and Resources:
Potential climatic impacts and reliability of very large-scale wind farms --From [3]
Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors: An old idea in nuclear power gets reexamined --From [4]