The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Open Source Contribution Under Different Source Control Management Models: Difference between revisions
From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We plan to analyse the differences between projects managed with monolithic ([http://subversion.tigris.org subversion]) versus distributed ([http://git-scm.com git] and [http://mercurial.selenic.com mercurial] source control management. | We plan to analyse the differences between projects managed with monolithic ([http://subversion.tigris.org subversion]) versus distributed ([http://git-scm.com git] and [http://mercurial.selenic.com mercurial]) source control management. | ||
Research Question: | Research Question: |
Revision as of 15:25, 11 June 2010
We plan to analyse the differences between projects managed with monolithic (subversion) versus distributed (git and mercurial) source control management.
Research Question:
Do different source control management models have implications for:
- Structure of contribution community
- Size of contribution community
- Growth of contribution community
- Code volatility
Group Members:
Interested: