Actions

Communicating complexity: Difference between revisions

From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki

No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


Wondering if anyone else is interested in the role the tools of complexity might/should play in communicating nonlinearity, etc., to non-specialists (policy makers, local stakeholders).
Wondering if anyone else is interested in the role the tools of complexity might/should play in communicating nonlinearity, etc., to non-specialists (policy makers, local stakeholders).
I am always up for discussions of how to communicate scientific ideas effectively to non-scientists.  Not sure I understand exactly what you're talking about though.  Do you mean using complexity to communicate complexity?  Ryan.
I would be up to a discussion concerning the communication of scientific ideas to non-scientists too (complexity just as much as any other scientific issue for that matter). [[Amelie Veron]]
I would like to learn AS MUCH about it as possible ! [[Saleha Habibullah]] (Moved comment here from the related [[Complexity for the General Public]] topic. - [[Brian Lawler]])
I'd like to discuss this and perhaps contribute to some industrialist ways of thinking [[Alex Healing]]
I would be interested in discussing complexity to policy makers in particular, but also to other researchers who haven't heard of complex systems(and maybe don't buy into it). [[Heather B]]
-----
Here are some topics that I propose we discuss:
* How to express complexity to people who ''are not'' adept at some of the tools we are using in the CSSS program - differential equations, MatLab, the vocabulary of complexity and chaos, ''etc''.
* How to express complexity in the tools of everyday business and government workers - PowerPoint, Excel, etc.
* How to engage effectively with skilled professionals (engineers, economists, accounting/finance, ...) in their vocabulary
* Are there extensions to existing, relatively widely used, modeling tools such as flow charts, data flow diagrams, UML models, etc. that can properly express complex systems?
* How do we convey the key research topics worthy of pursuit to the research sponsors and similar stakeholders?
- [[Brian Lawler]]

Latest revision as of 03:55, 11 June 2007

Contact: Andrew Bell (andybell@umich.edu)

Wondering if anyone else is interested in the role the tools of complexity might/should play in communicating nonlinearity, etc., to non-specialists (policy makers, local stakeholders).

I am always up for discussions of how to communicate scientific ideas effectively to non-scientists. Not sure I understand exactly what you're talking about though. Do you mean using complexity to communicate complexity? Ryan.

I would be up to a discussion concerning the communication of scientific ideas to non-scientists too (complexity just as much as any other scientific issue for that matter). Amelie Veron

I would like to learn AS MUCH about it as possible ! Saleha Habibullah (Moved comment here from the related Complexity for the General Public topic. - Brian Lawler)

I'd like to discuss this and perhaps contribute to some industrialist ways of thinking Alex Healing

I would be interested in discussing complexity to policy makers in particular, but also to other researchers who haven't heard of complex systems(and maybe don't buy into it). Heather B


Here are some topics that I propose we discuss:

  • How to express complexity to people who are not adept at some of the tools we are using in the CSSS program - differential equations, MatLab, the vocabulary of complexity and chaos, etc.
  • How to express complexity in the tools of everyday business and government workers - PowerPoint, Excel, etc.
  • How to engage effectively with skilled professionals (engineers, economists, accounting/finance, ...) in their vocabulary
  • Are there extensions to existing, relatively widely used, modeling tools such as flow charts, data flow diagrams, UML models, etc. that can properly express complex systems?
  • How do we convey the key research topics worthy of pursuit to the research sponsors and similar stakeholders?

- Brian Lawler