Actions

Limits to Prediction: Difference between revisions

From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Limits_to_Prediction}}
{{Limits_to_Prediction}}


Co-hosted by Towers Watson
Co-hosted by Willis Towers Watson


Held at 71 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6TP, United Kingdom
Held at 71 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6TP, United Kingdom


Tuesday, September 1, 2015
Friday, September 9, 2016




----
----
'''Summary:''' The contemporary investment industry can be viewed as a network of key constituents, including end savers, asset owners, investment managers, service providers, and governments and other regulators.  Each of these constituents has its own set of goals, constraints, and incentives, which may or may not be aligned with those of other constituents, and in some cases may be somewhat opposed. This topical meeting will examine current world wide efforts to understand this complex network of interacting groups, and to re-conceptualize and even reinvent aspects of the structure, constraints, and incentives of different components of the system with the goal of improving the system as a whole for the end saver.
'''Summary:''' In what situations are there absolute limits to prediction, and how are those limits determined? There is a relatively short list of high-level reasons that a system can be hard to predict: (1) the dynamics may be in some sense inherently unpredictable (e.g. chaotic), (2) the financial or energetic cost of measuring the system to sufficient accuracy may be prohibitive, (3) the computational problem of prediction may be difficult (e.g. NP-complete, or worse, uncomputable), even when provided with unlimited data, and/or (4) the state space itself may be unknown, as is the case in systems that adapt, evolve, or innovate.
This Topical / Business "Vitamin B" meeting will report out on an SFI scientific workshop, which convened researchers who work on the mathematical, algorithmic, and practical aspects of prediction. This practitioner-oriented meeting will include members of the original scientific workshop, as well as relevant social scientists and decision-makers from ACtioN member organizations.

Latest revision as of 22:33, 8 August 2016

ACtioN Navigation

Co-hosted by Willis Towers Watson

Held at 71 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6TP, United Kingdom

Friday, September 9, 2016



Summary: In what situations are there absolute limits to prediction, and how are those limits determined? There is a relatively short list of high-level reasons that a system can be hard to predict: (1) the dynamics may be in some sense inherently unpredictable (e.g. chaotic), (2) the financial or energetic cost of measuring the system to sufficient accuracy may be prohibitive, (3) the computational problem of prediction may be difficult (e.g. NP-complete, or worse, uncomputable), even when provided with unlimited data, and/or (4) the state space itself may be unknown, as is the case in systems that adapt, evolve, or innovate. This Topical / Business "Vitamin B" meeting will report out on an SFI scientific workshop, which convened researchers who work on the mathematical, algorithmic, and practical aspects of prediction. This practitioner-oriented meeting will include members of the original scientific workshop, as well as relevant social scientists and decision-makers from ACtioN member organizations.