The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Open Source Contribution Under Different Source Control Management Models: Difference between revisions
From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We plan to analyse the differences between projects managed with monolithic ([http://subversion.tigris.org subversion]) versus distributed ([http://git-scm.com git] and [http://mercurial.selenic.com mercurial] source control management. | We plan to analyse the differences between projects managed with monolithic ([http://subversion.tigris.org subversion]) versus distributed ([http://git-scm.com git] and [http://mercurial.selenic.com mercurial]) source control management. | ||
Research Question: | Research Question: | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Interested: | Interested: | ||
* [[Oana Carja]] | * [[Oana Carja]] | ||
* [[Erika Fille Legara]] | |||
Latest revision as of 03:45, 16 June 2010
We plan to analyse the differences between projects managed with monolithic (subversion) versus distributed (git and mercurial) source control management.
Research Question:
Do different source control management models have implications for:
- Structure of contribution community
- Size of contribution community
- Growth of contribution community
- Code volatility
Group Members:
Interested: