Actions

Boundary Conditions and Dynamics of Collective Intelligence: Difference between revisions

From Santa Fe Institute Events Wiki

No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Motivation ==
== Motivation ==
After Dr Page's first lecture I posted a [http://www.santafe.edu/events/workshops/index.php/Measuring_diversity_of_expressed_thought_in_the_blogosphere  project description] for measuring diversity. Later [http://www.santafe.edu/events/workshops/index.php/Amir_Goldberg Amir] said: Why just look at where enough diversity starts? Why not look at what happens among a diverse group when they are together that causes their diversity to be diffused into homogeneity and their value as a diverse group lost? [http://www.santafe.edu/events/workshops/index.php/Joseph_DeRosa Joe] has been expressing similar thoughts in the realm of task-team formation and finding the optimal point of team dissolution, the point where most of the ideas have been shared and no more value remains for the group's continuance.<br>
After Dr Page's first lecture [http://www.santafe.edu/events/workshops/index.php/Paul_Dwyer Paul] posted a [http://www.santafe.edu/events/workshops/index.php/Measuring_diversity_of_expressed_thought_in_the_blogosphere  project description] for measuring diversity, particularly the point where enough diversity is present to be effective in producing collective intelligence. Later [http://www.santafe.edu/events/workshops/index.php/Amir_Goldberg Amir] said: Why just look at where enough diversity starts? Why not look at what happens among a diverse group when they are together that causes their diversity to be diffused into homogeneity and their value as a diverse group lost? [http://www.santafe.edu/events/workshops/index.php/Joseph_DeRosa Joe] has been expressing similar thoughts in the realm of task-team formation and finding the optimal point of team dissolution, the point where most of the ideas have been shared and no more value remains for the group's continuance.<br>
<br>
<br>
So lets throw some questions out there:<br>
So lets throw some questions out there:<br>
Line 7: Line 7:
<br>
<br>
Is the future of such a group always decay into homogeneous redundancy or is some kind of evolution possible?<br>
Is the future of such a group always decay into homogeneous redundancy or is some kind of evolution possible?<br>
This sounds really interesting! After reading this I've posted my tutorial offer for social choice theory, which may be useful to tackle these questions. [[Social Choice Theory and the problem of collective rationality]] Kai

Latest revision as of 03:41, 8 June 2007

Motivation

After Dr Page's first lecture Paul posted a project description for measuring diversity, particularly the point where enough diversity is present to be effective in producing collective intelligence. Later Amir said: Why just look at where enough diversity starts? Why not look at what happens among a diverse group when they are together that causes their diversity to be diffused into homogeneity and their value as a diverse group lost? Joe has been expressing similar thoughts in the realm of task-team formation and finding the optimal point of team dissolution, the point where most of the ideas have been shared and no more value remains for the group's continuance.

So lets throw some questions out there:

How do we define, measure and detect the boundary conditions for effective collective intelligence?

Is the future of such a group always decay into homogeneous redundancy or is some kind of evolution possible?


This sounds really interesting! After reading this I've posted my tutorial offer for social choice theory, which may be useful to tackle these questions. Social Choice Theory and the problem of collective rationality Kai