|
|
(18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Randomness, Structure and Causality}} | | {{Randomness, Structure and Causality}} |
|
| |
|
| <head><title>Santa Fe Institute Workshop Summary Description//</title>
| | |
| <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
| | == Randomness, Structure, and Causality: Measures of complexity from theory to applications == |
| <meta name="generator" content="TeX4ht (http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/)">
| | |
| <meta name="originator" content="TeX4ht (http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/)">
| | |
| <!-- html -->
| | == Organizers == |
| <meta name="src" content="rsc.tex"> | | Jim Crutchfield (SFI & UC Davis) |
| <meta name="date" content="2010-12-13 15:07:00">
| | |
| <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="rsc.css">
| | Jon Machta (SFI & UMass Amherst) |
| </head><body
| | |
| >
| | == Workshop summary == |
| <div class="maketitle">
| | [[Media:Rsc.pdf| Summary Description (PDF)]] |
| <h2 class="titleHead"><a
| | |
| id="x1-1doc"></a>
| | <br> |
| Santa Fe Institute Workshop<br />
| | In 1989, SFI hosted a |
| Summary Description
| | workshop—''Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information''—on |
| </h2>
| | fundamental definitions of complexity. This |
| <div class="RRAP">
| | workshop and the proceedings that resulted stimulated a |
| <span
| | great deal of thinking about how to define complexity. In many ways—some |
| class="cmr-10">(</span><span class="date" ><span
| | direct, many indirect—the foundational theme colored much of SFI's research |
| class="cmr-10">Dated: December 13, 2010</span></span><span
| | planning and, more generally, the evolution of complex system science since |
| class="cmr-10">)</span>
| | then. Complex systems science has considerably matured as a field in the intervening |
| </div>
| | decades and we believe it is now time to revisit fundamental aspects of the field in a |
| <div class="abstractheading"></div>
| | workshop format at SFI. Partly, this is to take stock; but it is |
| <div class="abstract">
| | also to ask what innovations are needed for the coming decades, as |
| <!--l. 50--><p class="noindent" ><span
| | complex systems continues to extend its influence in the sciences, |
| class="cmbx-12">Title</span><span
| | engineering, and humanities. |
| class="cmr-12">:</span><br
| | |
| class="newline" /><span
| | The goal of the workshop is to bring together workers from a |
| class="cmr-12">  Randomness, Structure, and Causality:</span><br
| | variety of fields to discuss structural and dynamical measures of complexity appropriate for their |
| class="newline" /><span
| | field and the commonality between these measures. Some of the questions that |
| class="cmr-12"> </span><span
| | we will address in the workshop are: |
| class="cmr-12"> </span><span
| | <ul> |
| class="cmr-12">  Measures of complexity from theory to applications</span><br
| | <li> |
| class="newline" />
| | Are there fundamental measures of complexity that can be applied across |
| <span
| | disciplines or are measures of complexity necessarily tied to particular |
| class="cmbx-12">Dates</span><span
| | domains? |
| class="cmr-12">: 9-13 January 2011</span><br
| | <li> |
| class="newline" /> <span
| | How is a system's causal organization, reflected in models of its |
| class="cmbx-12">Location</span><span
| | dynamics, related to its complexity? |
| class="cmr-12">: Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico</span><br
| | <li> |
| class="newline" /> <span
| | Are there universal mechanisms at work that lead to increases in |
| class="cmbx-12">Organizers</span><span
| | complexity or does complexity arise for qualitatively different reasons in |
| class="cmr-12">:</span><br
| | different settings? |
| class="newline" /><span
| | <li> |
| class="cmr-12">  Jim Crutchfield (SFI and UC Davis, chaos@ucdavis.edu)</span><br
| | Can we reach agreement on general properties that all measures of |
| class="newline" /><span
| | complexity must have? |
| class="cmr-12">  Jon Machta (SFI and University of Massachusetts, machta@physics.umass.edu)</span>
| | <li> |
| </div>
| | How would the scientific community benefit from a consensus on the |
| <div class="frontpagefootnotes">
| | properties that measures of complexity should possess? |
| </div>
| | </ul> |
| </div>
| | |
| <a
| | It's a four-day workshop with about 20 or so participants. |
| id="likesection.1"></a>
| | We will have a stimulating and highly interdisciplinary group with |
| <h3 class="likesectionHead"><a
| | representation from physics, biology, computer science, social science, and |
| id="x1-1000"></a>Description</h3>
| | mathematics. An important goal is to understand the successes and |
| <!--l. 75--><p class="noindent" >In 1989, SFI hosted a workshop—<span
| | difficulties in deploying complexity measures in practice. And so, |
| class="cmti-10x-x-109">Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information</span>—on fundamental
| | participants come from both theory and experiment, with a |
|
| | particular emphasis on those who can constructively bridge the two. |
|
| | |
| definitions of complexity. This workshop and the proceedings that resulted [<a
| | Since the 1989 SFI workshop, a number of distinct strands have developed in |
| href="#XZure89a">1</a>] stimulated a great deal of
| | the effort to measure complexity. Several of the well-developed strands are |
| thinking about how to define complexity. In many ways—some direct, many indirect—the foundational
| | based on |
| theme colored much of SFI’s research planning and, more generally, the evolution of complex system
| | <ul> |
| science since then. Complex systems science has considerably matured as a field in the intervening
| | <li>Predictive information and excess entropy, |
| decades and we believe it is now time to revisit fundamental aspects of the field in a workshop format at
| | <li>Statistical complexity and causal structure, |
| SFI. Partly, this is to take stock; but it is also to ask what innovations are needed for the coming
| | <li> |
| decades, as complex systems continues to extend its influence in the sciences, engineering, and
| | Logical depth and computational complexity, and |
| humanities.
| | <li> |
| <!--l. 90--><p class="indent" > The goal of the workshop is to bring together workers from a variety of fields to discuss structural and
| | Effective complexity. |
| dynamical measures of complexity appropriate for their field and the commonality between these
| | </ul> |
| measures. Some of the questions that we will address in the workshop are: | | While these measures are broadly based on information theory or the theory of |
| <ol class="enumerate1" >
| | computation, the full set of connections and contrasts between them is not |
| <li
| | well developed. Some have sought to clarify the relationship among these |
| class="enumerate" id="x1-1002x1">Are there fundamental measures of complexity that can be applied across disciplines or are
| | measures and so another goal of |
| measures of complexity necessarily tied to particular domains?
| | the workshop is to foster this kind of comparative work by bringing together |
| </li>
| | researchers developing various measures. |
| <li
| | |
| class="enumerate" id="x1-1004x2">How is a system’s causal organization, reflected in models of its dynamics, related to its
| | A second motivation for the workshop is to bring together workers interested in |
| complexity?
| | foundational questions—who are mainly from the physics, mathematics, and |
| </li>
| | computer science communities—with complex systems scientists in experimental, |
| <li
| | data-driven fields who have developed quantitative measures of complexity, |
| class="enumerate" id="x1-1006x3">Are there universal mechanisms at work that lead to increases in complexity or does
| | organization, and emergence that are useful in their fields. The range of |
| complexity arise for qualitatively different reasons in different settings?
| | data-driven fields using complexity measures is impressively broad: ranging |
| </li>
| | from molecular excitation dynamics and spectroscopic |
| <li
| | observations of the conformational dynamics of single molecules |
| class="enumerate" id="x1-1008x4">Can we reach agreement on general properties that all measures of complexity must have?
| | through modeling subgrid structure in turbulent fluid flows |
| </li>
| | and new visualization methods for emergent flow patterns |
| <li
| | to monitoring market efficiency and the organization of animal |
| class="enumerate" id="x1-1010x5">How would the scientific community benefit from a consensus on the properties that measures
| | social structure. The intention is to find relations between the |
| of complexity should possess?</li></ol>
| | practically motivated measures and the more general and fundamentally motivated |
| <!--l. 112--><p class="indent" > It’s a four-day workshop with about 20 or so participants. We will have a stimulating and highly
| | measures. Can the practically motivated measures be improved by an |
| interdisciplinary group with representation from physics, biology, computer science, social science, and
| | appreciation of fundamental principles? Can |
| mathematics. An important goal is to understand the successes and difficulties in deploying complexity
| | fundamental definitions be sharpened by consideration of how they interact with |
| measures in practice. And so, participants come from both theory and experiment, with a particular
| | real-world data? |
| emphasis on those who can constructively bridge the two.
| | |
| <!--l. 120--><p class="indent" > Since the 1989 SFI workshop, a number of distinct strands have developed in the effort to measure
| | Overall, the workshop's intention is to re-ignite the efforts that began with |
| complexity. Several of the well-developed strands are based on
| | ''Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information'' workshop. A new level |
|
| | of rigor, in concepts and in analysis, is now apparent in how statistical |
|
| | mechanics, nonlinear dynamics, information theory, and computation theory can be applied to complex |
| <ul class="itemize1">
| | systems. The meteoric rise of both computer power and machine learning has led |
| <li class="itemize">Predictive information and excess entropy [<a
| | to new algorithms that address many of the original computational difficulties in |
| href="#XJunc79">2</a>–<a
| | managing data from complex systems and in estimating various complexity |
| href="#XCrut01a">7</a>],
| | measures. Given progress on all these fronts, the time is ripe to develop a |
| </li>
| | much closer connection between fundamental theory and applications in many |
| <li class="itemize">Statistical complexity and causal structure [<a
| | areas of complex systems science. |
| href="#XCrut88a">8</a>–<a
| |
| href="#XShal98a">10</a>],
| |
| </li>
| |
| <li class="itemize">Logical depth and computational complexity [<a
| |
| href="#XBenn90">11</a>–<a
| |
| href="#XMach06a">15</a>], and
| |
| </li>
| |
| <li class="itemize">Effective complexity [<a
| |
| href="#XGeLl96">16</a>, <a
| |
| href="#Xay-2008">17</a>].</li></ul>
| |
| <!--l. 134--><p class="noindent" >While these measures are broadly based on information theory or the theory of computation, the full set of
| |
| connections and contrasts between them is not well developed. Some have sought to clarify
| |
| the relationship among these measures [<a
| |
| href="#XCrut01a">7</a>, <a
| |
| href="#Xay-2008">17</a>–<a
| |
| href="#XFeld98b">20</a>] and so another goal of the workshop is
| |
| to foster this kind of comparative work by bringing together researchers developing various
| |
| measures.
| |
| <!--l. 141--><p class="indent" > A second motivation for the workshop is to bring together workers interested in foundational
| |
| questions—who are mainly from the physics, mathematics, and computer science communities—with
| |
| complex systems scientists in experimental, data-driven fields who have developed quantitative
| |
| measures of complexity, organization, and emergence that are useful in their fields. The range of
| |
| data-driven fields using complexity measures is impressively broad: ranging from molecular
| |
| excitation dynamics [<a
| |
| href="#XNeru08a">21</a>] and spectroscopic observations of the conformational dynamics of
| |
| single molecules [<a
| |
| href="#XLi08a">22</a>] through modeling subgrid structure in turbulent fluid flows [<a
| |
| href="#XPalm00a">23</a>] and new
| |
| visualization methods for emergent flow patterns [<a
| |
| href="#XJani07a">24</a>] to monitoring market efficiency [<a
| |
| href="#XYang08a">25</a>] and the
| |
| organization of animal social structure [<a
| |
| href="#XAy07a">26</a>]. The intention is to find relations between the practically
| |
| motivated measures and the more general and fundamentally motivated measures. Can the
| |
| practically motivated measures be improved by an appreciation of fundamental principles? Can
| |
| fundamental definitions be sharpened by consideration of how they interact with real-world
| |
| data?
| |
| <!--l. 159--><p class="indent" > Overall, the workshop’s intention is to re-ignite the efforts that began with <span
| |
| class="cmti-10x-x-109">Complexity, Entropy,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmti-10x-x-109">and the Physics of Information </span>workshop. A new level of rigor, in concepts and in analysis,
| |
| is now apparent in how statistical mechanics, nonlinear dynamics, information theory, and
| |
| computation theory can be applied to complex systems. The meteoric rise of both computer
| |
| power and machine learning has led to new algorithms that address many of the original
| |
| computational difficulties in managing data from complex systems and in estimating various
| |
| complexity measures. Given progress on all these fronts, the time is ripe to develop a much closer
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| connection between fundamental theory and applications in many areas of complex systems
| |
| science.
| |
| <!--l. 1--><p class="indent" >
| |
| <a
| |
| id="likesection.2"></a><a
| |
| id="Q1-1-1"></a>
| |
| <!--l. 1--><p class="noindent" >
| |
| <div class="thebibliography">
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XZure89a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[1]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">W.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Zurek, editor. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Entropy, Complexity, and the Physics of Information</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, volume VIII of </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">SFI Studies</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmti-10">in the Sciences of Complexity</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1990.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XJunc79"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[2]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">A.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> del Junco and M.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Rahe. Finitary codings and weak bernoulli partitions. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Proc. AMS</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 75:259,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">1979.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XCrut82b"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[3]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">J.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> P. Crutchfield and N.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> H. Packard. Symbolic dynamics of one-dimensional maps: Entropies, finite</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">precision, and noise. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Intl. J. Theo. Phys.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 21:433, 1982.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XErik87"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[4]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">K-E. Eriksson and K.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Lindgren. Structural information in self-organizing systems. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Physica Scripta</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">1987.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XGras86"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[5]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">P.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Grassberger. Toward a quantitative theory of self-generated complexity. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Intl. J. Theo. Phys.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">25:907, 1986.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XEbel99a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[6]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">W.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Ebeling, L.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Molgedey, J.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Kurths, and U.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Schwarz. Entropy, complexity, predictability and</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">data analysis of time series and letter sequences. </span><a
| |
| href=" http://summa.physik.hu-berlin.de/tsd/" class="url" ><span
| |
| class="cmtt-10">http://summa.physik.hu-berlin.de/tsd/</span></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 1999.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XCrut01a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[7]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">J.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> P. Crutchfield and D.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> P. Feldman. Regularities unseen, randomness observed: Levels of entropy</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">convergence. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">CHAOS</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 13(1):25–54, 2003.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XCrut88a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[8]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">J.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> P. Crutchfield and K.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Young. Inferring statistical complexity. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Phys. Rev. Let.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 63:105–108, 1989.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XCrut97a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[9]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">J.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> P. Crutchfield and D.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> P. Feldman. Statistical complexity of simple one-dimensional spin systems.</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Phys. Rev. E</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 55(2):1239R–1243R, 1997.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XShal98a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[10]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">C.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> R. Shalizi and J.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> P. Crutchfield. Computational mechanics: Pattern and prediction, structure</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">and simplicity. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">J. Stat. Phys.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 104:817–879, 2001.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XBenn90"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[11]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">C.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> H. Bennett. How to define complexity in physics, and why. In W.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> H. Zurek, editor, </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Complexity,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Entropy and the Physics of Information</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, page 137. SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Vol.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> 7,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">Addison-Wesley, 1990.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XVita93a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[12]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">M.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Li and P.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> M.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> B. Vitanyi. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its Applications</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">.</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XBenn95"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[13]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">C.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> H. Bennett. Universal computation and physical dynamics. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Physica D</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 86:268, 1995.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XMaGr96"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[14]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">J.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Machta and R.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Greenlaw. The computational complexity of generating random fractals. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">J. Stat.</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Phys.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 82:1299, 1996.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XMach06a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[15]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">J.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Machta. Complexity, parallel computation and statistical physics. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Complexity Journal</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">11(5):46–64, 2006.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XGeLl96"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[16]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">Murray Gell-Mann and Seth Lloyd. Information measures, effective complexity, and total</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">information. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Complexity</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 2(1):44–52, 1996.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="Xay-2008"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[17]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">Nihat Ay, Markus Mueller, and Arleta Szkola. Effective complexity and its relation to logical depth,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">2008.</span>
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XLind88b"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[18]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">K.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Lindgren and M.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> G. Norhdal. Complexity measures and cellular automata. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Complex Systems</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">2(4):409–440, 1988.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XCrut92c"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[19]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">J.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> P. Crutchfield. The calculi of emergence: Computation, dynamics, and induction. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Physica D</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">75:11–54, 1994.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XFeld98b"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[20]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">D.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> P. Feldman and J.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> P. Crutchfield. Discovering non-critical organization: Statistical mechanical,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">information theoretic, and computational views of patterns in simple one-dimensional spin systems.</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">1998. Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 98-04-026.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XNeru08a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[21]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">D.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Nerukh, V.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Ryabov, and R.C. Glen. Complex temporal patterns in molecular dynamics: A</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">direct measure of the phase-space exploration by the trajectory at macroscopic time scales. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Physical</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Review E</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 77(3):036225, 2008.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XLi08a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[22]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">C.-B. Li, H.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Yang, and T.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Komatsuzaki. Multiscale complex network of protein conformational</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">fluctuations in single-molecule time series. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">105:536–541, 2008.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XPalm00a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[23]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">A.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> J. Palmer, C.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> W. Fairall, and W.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> A. Brewer. Complexity in the atmosphere. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">IEEE Transactions</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmti-10">on Geoscience and Remote Sensing</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 38(4):2056–2063, 2000.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XJani07a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[24]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">H.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Janicke, A.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Wiebel, G.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Scheuermann, and W.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Kollmann. Multifield visualization using</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">local statistical complexity. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">IEEE Transactions on In Visualization and Computer Graphics</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">,</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">13(6):1384–1391, 2007.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XYang08a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[25]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">J.-S. Yang, W.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Kwak, T.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Kaizoji, and I.-M. Kim. Increasing market efficiency in the stock markets.</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmti-10">European Physical Journal B</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 61(2):241–246, 2008.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| <p class="bibitem" ><span class="biblabel">
| |
| <a
| |
| id="XAy07a"></a><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">[26]</span> <span class="bibsp"><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> </span></span></span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">N.</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10"> Ay, J.C. Flack, and D.C. Krakauer. Robustness and complexity co-constructed in multimodal</span>
| |
| <span
| |
| class="cmr-10">signalling networks. </span><span
| |
| class="cmti-10">Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B</span><span
| |
| class="cmr-10">, 362:441–447, 2007.</span>
| |
| </p>
| |
| </div>
| |
|
| |
| </body>
| |